Skip to main content

Company Law and the Listing Rules for public companies determine the bare minimum obligations that companies have to shareholders (and that directors have to companies). However it has been recognised for many years that public companies should manage their affairs according to certain principles and using certain practices that extend these obligations. Only by so doing are the best interests of the company and shareholders met. These extensions are more "recommended codes of conduct" than legal obligations - although they are now included in the Listing Rules it is permitted for companies to ignore some of the provisions (although they are asked to explain why they have done so in their Annual Report).

The size and history of the company can have some impact on adherence to these Corporate Governance Codes. For example, a company that was founded and continues to be dominated by a single entrepreneur who has a major shareholding may find it acceptable to combine the roles of chief executive and chairman based on the argument that any other chairman may be purely a figurehead. Other particular circumstances can also justify exceptions to the code, and there is still argument about the merits of some of the rules in the latest Combined Code.

Numerous committees and inquiries have been held in the last few years in the UK to recommend resulting codes including Cadbury, Turnbull, Smith, Higgs and Hampel. They tend to cover such matters as directors' pay, the appointment and duties of directors, and audit practices. As such many of the individual topics are covered elsewhere in the Policies section of this web site. Other bodies such as the Association of British Insurers and individual institutional investors have also published their own additional guidelines in some areas.

The current Corporate Governance Code is this the responsibility of the Financial Reporting Council and the Association of British Insurers also issues corporate governance guidelines.

UKSA submitted these comments on the operation of the Combined Code in June 2007.

In June 2009, we submitted these comments to the Walker Review of corporate governance in the UK Banking sector. UKSA's response to the Walker Review is here.

In October 2009, we responded to the FRC's consultation on the Combined Code in this document. It particularly covered the possible role of shareholder committees and the voting procedures at General Meetings.

For historic UKSA submissions on Corporate Governance, see:

Renew your membership

Renewing your UKSA membership is quick and easy, ensuring uninterrupted access to all the advantages of membership.

Responsible Investing



"Cogent, relevant, well-informed, astute and important" The Times

Click here to view


The Private Investor


Click here to view