|
The
following is the text of a press release that was issued by UKSA on the 8th
June 2004:
UKSA Deplores Move by
Hunting Plc to Redeem Preference Shares Without a Vote of Preference
Shareholders
Hunting Plc are proposing to redeem their
8.25% Cumulative Convertible Preference Shares of £1 at their par value.
This is despite the fact that they recently traded as high as 119.50p and
were trading at 111.50p immediately before the announcement. Even though the
share certificates clearly indicate that the shares “will not be
redeemable”, the company apparently considers that they can do this as a
“return of capital” under the Articles, and without taking a separate vote
of the Preference shareholders.
In essence, the company is permitting only
the Ordinary shareholders to vote on this matter, which is surely
prejudicial as there is an effective transfer of value from the preference
to the ordinary shareholders. The company argues that it is right to do this
as the company can borrow money at a lower rate of interest in the market
than it was paying on the preference shares, but UKSA would argue that all
shareholders in the company should be consulted in these circumstances, not
just those that are likely to benefit.
UKSA Chairman David Blundell has recently
said “The shares are held by a number of our members as they were a good
source of income and have always been listed as “irredeemable” so we feel
our members have been grossly misled in the past. We understand the desire
of the company to get out of an onerous obligation, but this seems to be
very inequitable. We encourage the preference shareholders to protest
against this action of the company and we urge all Hunting shareholders to
vote against this proposal”.
___________________________________________________________________
Several UKSA members were
affected by this proposal, including Robert Muriel who sent his
objections to the Chairman of UKSA (to contact Robert Muriel, telephone
020-7828-1447). Several commentators have pointed out that the move to
exclude preference shareholders from voting on this matter appeared to be
legally, as well as morally, dubious. The Chairman of Hunting Plc is Mr R.H
Hunting and their address is 3 Cockspur St, London SW1Y 5BQ if you wish to
make representations on this subject.
Postscript: The vote of
Ordinary shareholders took place at an EGM on the 30th June and the
resolution to cancel the Preference shares was passed by a very large
majority.
At the subsequent high
court hearing on the 28th July, several people spoke against the proposal,
including UKSA member Robert Muriel. After some hours of legal argument the
judge hearing the matter decided to approve the arrangement. This was
apparently on the basis that the Company's Articles should take precedence
and that irrespective of what had been said by the company elsewhere (eg. on
the share certificate), the shareholders should have checked the Articles
when they acquired the shares. Judges in such matters often appear
unwilling to step outside the technical legal position and consider the
wider public interest or moral merits of the situation.
Clearly any investor in
the shares of Hunting Plc would need to consider very carefully as to
whether they consider the company is being run on the highest principles and
in the interests of all shareholders. |